Search
Product Description
Intertidal Extents Model 25m 2.0.0
Product Description
eCat: # 113842
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/25/5a602cc9eb358
Product Description: Summary Description
| Sheet A.1 Definition and usage | |
|---|---|
| Product Name | Intertidal Extents Model 25m 2.0.0 |
| Title | ITEM_25_2.0.0 |
| Product Overview |
The Intertidal Extents Model product is a national scale gridded dataset characterising the spatial extents of the exposed intertidal zone, at intervals of the observed tidal range (Sagar et al. 2017). The current version (2.0) utilises all Landsat observations (5, 7, and 8) for Australian coastal regions (excluding off-shore Territories) between 1986 and 2016 (inclusive). ITEM v2.0 has implemented an improved tidal modelling framework (see Sagar et al. 2018 and Processing Step: Create a continental scale tidal modelling framework) over that utilised in ITEM v1.0. The expanded Landsat archive within the Digital Earth Australia (DEA) has also enabled the model extent (Figure 1) to be increased to cover a number of offshore reefs, including the full Great Barrier Reef and southern sections of the Torres Strait Islands. The DEA archive and new tidal modelling framework has improved the coverage and quality of the ITEM v2.0 relative extents model, particularly in regions where AGDC cell boundaries in ITEM v1.0 produced discontinuities or the imposed v1.0 cell structure resulted in poor quality tidal modelling (see Sagar et al. 2017). Examples of regions in ITEM v2.0 where these significant improvements have been noted include:
|
| Product Features |
The Intertidal Extents Model (ITEM v2.0) consists of three datasets derived from the Landsat NBAR data managed in Digital Earth Australia for the period 1986 to 2016.
ITEM v2.0 TIDAL MODEL The ITEMv2_tidalmodel.shp identifies the location and extents of the 306 polygons (Figure 1) used in the product, defined by the Continental Scale tidal modelling framework (see Processing Step: Create a continental scale tidal modelling framework). The shapefile also includes information on the lowest (LOT) and highest (HOT) observed tides for the cell, and hence the observed tidal range (HOT-LOT), based on tidal modelling for the time of acquisition of each of the corresponding Landsat observations in the cell polygon. Attributes: ID - Unique Polygon Identifier lon - Polygon Centroid Longitude lat - Polygon Centroid Latitude LOT - Lowest Observed Tide – The lowest modelled tidal height based on the acquisition times of all observations in the polygon. Relative to Mean Sea Level (MSL) (m). HOT - Highest Observed Tide – The highest modelled tidal height based on the acquisition times of all observations in the polygon. Relative to Mean Sea Level (MSL) (m). LMT - Lowest Modelled Tide - The lowest modelled tidal height based on the OTPS model for the full period of the archive. Relative to Mean Sea Level (MSL) (m). HMT - Highest Modelled Tide - The highest modelled tidal height based on the OTPS model for the full period of the archive. Relative to Mean Sea Level (MSL) (m).
THE RELATIVE EXTENTS MODEL v2.0 The Relative Extents Model (item_v2) utilises the tidal information attributed to each Landsat observation to indicate the spatial extent of intertidal substratum exposed at percentile intervals of the observed tidal range for the cell. The dataset consists of 306 raster files (NETCDF and Geotiff) corresponding to polygons of the continental scale tidal model. Naming convention: ITEM_REL_PolygonID_CentroidLongitude_CentroidLatitude e.g. ITEM_REL_95_153.67_-28.77.tif Attributes: Single Band Integer Raster: 0 – Always water
THE CONFIDENCE LAYER v2.0 The Confidence Layer (item_v2_conf) reflects the confidence level of the Relative Extents Model, based on the distribution of classification metrics (see Processing Step: Calculate NDWI for each Observation) within each of the percentile intervals of the tidal range. The layer should be used to filter region/pixels in the model where the derived spatial extents may be adversely affected by data and modelling errors. The dataset consists of 306 raster files (NETCDF and Geotiff) corresponding to polygons of the continental scale tidal model. Attributes: Naming Convention: ITEM_STD_PolygonID_CentroidLongitude_CentroidLatitude e.g. ITEM_STD_95_153.67_-28.77.tif Single Band Integer Raster: -6666 - No Data – Model is invalid. Indicates pixels where data quality and/or number of observations have resulted in no available observations in one or more of the percentile interval subsets. All other values – The pixel-based average of the NDWI standard deviations calculated independently for each percentile interval of the observed tidal range
|
| Product Versions | 2.0.0 |
| Product Background |
The Intertidal Extents Model (ITEM v2.0) product analyses GA’s historic archive of satellite imagery to derive a model of the spatial extents of the intertidal zone throughout the tidal cycle. The model can assist in understanding the relative elevation profile of the intertidal zone, delineating exposed areas at differing tidal heights and stages. The product differs from previous methods used to map the intertidal zone which have been predominately focused on analysing a small number of individual satellite images per location (e.g Ryu et al., 2002; Murray et al., 2012). By utilising a full 30 year time series of observations, the methodology enables us to overcome the requirement for clear, high quality observations acquired concurrent to the time of high and low tide. |
| Potential Applications |
The purpose of the ITEM v2.0 product is to assist in understanding the extent and topography of the Australian intertidal zone. Examples of where this knowledge can contribute include environmental monitoring applications for migratory bird species, habitat mapping in coastal regions, hydrodynamic modelling, and geomorphology studies of features in the intertidal zone. |
| Expected Lifespan | |
| Images |
,
|
B Specification
| Sheet B.1 Provenance and Algorithms | |
|---|---|
| Data Sources | |
| Major Algorithms | |
| Processing Sequence |
|
| Validation of Underlying Algorithms |
The Confidence layer is designed to assess the reliability of the Relative Extent Model. Within each tidal range percentile interval, the pixel-based standard deviation of the NDWI values for all observations in the interval subset is calculated. The average standard deviation across all tidal range intervals is then calculated and retained as a quality indicator in this product layer. The Confidence Layer reflects the pixel based consistency of the NDWI values within each subset of observations, based on the tidal range. Higher standard deviation values indicate water classification changes not based on the tidal cycle, and hence lower confidence in the extent model. Possible drivers of these changes include:
|
| Accuracy and Limitations |
Due the sun-synchronous nature of the various Landsat sensor observations; it is unlikely that the full physical extents of the tidal range in any cell will be observed. Hence, terminology has been adopted for the product to reflect the highest modelled tide observed in a given cell (HOT) and the lowest modelled tide observed (LOT) (Figure 2). These measures are relative to Mean Sea Level, and have no consistent relationship to Lowest (LAT) and Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT). The inclusion of the lowest (LMT) and highest (HMT) modelled tide values for each tidal polygon in the ITEMv2_tidalmodel dataset indicates the highest and lowest tides modelled for that location across the full time series by the OTPS model. The relative difference between the LOT and LMT (and HOT and HMT) heights gives an indication of the extent of the tidal range represented in the Relative Extents Model. As in ITEM v1.0, v2.0 contains some false positive land detection in open ocean regions. These are a function of the lack of data at the extremes of the observed tidal range, and features like glint and undetected cloud in these data poor regions/intervals. Methods to isolate and remove these features are in development for future versions. Issues in the DEA archive and data noise in the Esperance, WA region off Cape Le Grande and Cape Arid (Polygons 236,201,301) has resulted in significant artefacts in the model, and use of the model in this area is not recommended. |
C Availability
| Sheet C.1 Licencing and Access | |
|---|---|
| Support | Supported |
| Licencing | CC BY Attribution 4.0 International License |
| Search Tool | |
| Preview Facility | |
| Ordering and Distribution | Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) |
| Web Service Data Description | |
| Data Location | |
| Websites | Metadata |
| Catalogues | THREDDS |
| Services | GSKY WMS |
References:
- McFeeters, S.K., 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 17, 1425–1432. doi:10.1080/01431169608948714
- Murray, N.J., Phinn, S.R., Clemens, R.S., Roelfsema, C.M., Fuller, R.A., 2012. Continental Scale Mapping of Tidal Flats across East Asia Using the Landsat Archive. Remote Sens. 4, 3417–3426. doi:10.3390/rs4113417
- Ryu, J.-H., Won, J.-S., Min, K.D., 2002. Waterline extraction from Landsat TM data in a tidal flat: A case study in Gomso Bay, Korea. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 442–456. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00059-7
- Sagar, S., Roberts, D., Bala, B., Lymburner, L., 2017. Extracting the intertidal extent and topography of the Australian coastline from a 28 year time series of Landsat observations. Remote Sensing of Environment 195, 153–169. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.009
- Sagar, S., Phillips, C., Bala, B., Roberts, D., Lymburner, L., 2018. Generating Continental Scale Pixel-Based Surface Reflectance Composites in Coastal Regions with the Use of a Multi-Resolution Tidal Model. Remote Sensing 10, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030480
,
